In the article "Intertextuality and Biblical studies: A Review" by Dr. Steve Moyise, the author analyses the way in which five "types" of intertextuality are used in biblical texts. He enumerates these types: intertextual echo, narrative intertextuality, exegetical intertextuality, dialogical intertextuality, and postmodern intertextuality. He considers that in spite of the fact that intertextuality is a very productive and creative conception, it has a few drawbacks. The author states that it would be better if scholars clarified what type of intertextuality they had used or specified the theorist they were depending on while doing their research. Dr. Steve Moyise suggests using an "umbrella" term for complex interactions between different texts as it is an evocative term. I have chosen this article because it is connected to the topic of my course paper. It was quite useful for me to learn these very types of intertextuality and that the author sugg...
Zhenya,
ОтветитьУдалитьI'm sorry but as I can see all your posts were published the same day. Can you explain why?
As for your LR, you should have identified the connections between the reviwed works and included the explanation of it into your LR because one of its purposes is to identify this connections and dwell upon it in the review to place your own study in context. Also, your conclusions need further development because they are not quite adequate to what the conclusions in such works are supposed to do.
Introduction 4
Article review 4
Conclusions 3
Language 5
References 5
Total 4
I am very sorry but it seems that I only "saved" my works and didn't know that you weren't able to see my works. One of my groupmates told me about it and I published everything I had written at once. I understand that I only have myself to blame but I hope that this incident won't influence my final mark.
УдалитьI have changed a few things in my "literature review" work, so could you please check it one more time?